Germany’s Colonial Memory Failure – Namibian 15-02-2026

Germany’s Colonial Memory Failure Analysis by Henning Melber in the Namibian on Germany's process of dealing with genocide in German South West Africa 1904-1908 screenshot

“Germany’s Colonial Memory Failure

By Henning Melber
15 February 2026

[…]

The first genocide of the 20th century took place in South West Africa, where an estimated two thirds of the Ovaherero, a third of the Nama and numerous Damara and San people were deliberately killed, with lasting consequences for the descendants of the victims until today.

Ending with World War 1, colonialism was widely degraded to a mere footnote of German history. In West Germany it was mainly perceived through an uncritical lens.

In East Germany, the colonial archives and the support of the anti-colonial struggle fostered a critical historiography.

As different as these engagements were, they had no impact on a memory culture among the wider public in both countries.

This has changed since reunification. Civil society has made inroads in the public discourse. Post-colonial initiatives, Afro-Germans and scholars have engaged with the brutal forms of German colonialism.

They have all managed to obtain some media coverage and entered mainstream debates, if only with limited impact.

[…]

MODEST INROADS

In 2015, the German government admitted that the warfare in South West Africa was genocide from today’s perspective.

German-Namibian government negotiations resulted in a controversial joint declaration not yet adopted. This has created increased debates on how to come to terms with the past in the present.

The so-called traffic light coalition of the Social Democrats (SPD), the Greens and the Liberal Party (FDP) declared in its coalition agreement of December 2021 the reconciliation with Namibia an indispensable task of historic and moral responsibility.

[…]

But apart from an intensification of provenience research and the restitution of some looted artefacts (notably a few Benin bronzes) and human remains, little has happened.

[…]

REACTIONARY ROLL-BACK

The new discourses provoked colonial-apologetic revisionism rejecting post-colonial efforts as a ‘guilt complex’.

A draft resolution submitted by the right-wing Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) to parliament in December 2019 argued that German colonialism contributed to the liberation of the African continent from archaic structures.

It called on the government to develop a commemorative culture that acknowledged the beneficial aspects of the German colonial era, to promote such perspectives in school curricula; to decisively oppose demands for reparations, to refuse the restitution of cultural goods merely for reasons that the colonial times were ‘criminal’, and to appeal to communities in the federal states to maintain street names which memorialised colonial personages and places.

It attacked ‘cultural Marxist inspired post- and de-colonialism’ and bemoaned a paradigm shift since German unification, creating the impression that critical colonial-historical studies had since then been indoctrinated by East German ideology.

[…]

RELEGATION OF COLONIAL MEMORY

The current government of CDU/CSU and SPD entered in May 2025 a coalition agreement.

It deals with colonialism in three sentences.

Namibia is not mentioned any longer. It declares to keep an eye on creating a dignified place of memory for dealing with colonialism, but there is no mention of this under memorials or elsewhere.

Such initiative would be a task for Wolfram Weimer, appointed as state secretary for culture and media in the office of the chancellor.

[…]

In September 2025, Weimer presented his new state memory concept, in which colonialism is not mentioned.

Using the Holocaust as argument to disrespect in official memory culture other forms of trauma caused by mass violence of the German state creates a calendar with the Holocaust as first breach of civilisation in denial of earlier uncivilised acts.

Not by coincidence reminds Hannah Arendt of the practices in the German colonies and the mindset of the perpetrators as seeds, which were bearing fruits in the Nazi regime.

The otherwise admirable willingness to face the responsibilities for the Holocaust has, as Pankaj Mishra observed, de-sensitised towards other forms of mass crimes.

Such selectivity by omission is tantamount to memory failure.

* This was presented at a conference by Historians Without Borders on ‘Narratives of Power: Memory Politics in Russia, Germany and the Contemporary World’, held in Potsdam on 28 October [2025]. Henning Melber is an associate of the Nordic Africa Institute in Uppsala and an extraordinary professor at the University of Pretoria and the University of the Free State in Bloemfontein, South Africa.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You can send us a comment without registering / logging in.

Please note that all comments have to be reviewed. This may take some time. If it does not meet our criteria or guidelines, it will not be published.

0 Comments

You might also be interested in the following post from Media Reports…
Tag-based search of entire website:
Research more Dialogue…
l

Events on Records

i

Media Reports

Arts

w

Perspectives

Share via
Copy link